Eight on the way to Twelve – the Abarth V8 Engine

Much was positive for Abarth as 1965 dawned.  Especially so in terms of the marque’s racing exploits.  For three years in succession, Abarth had taken GT World Championship honours, in the 1 litre class in ’62, 1.3 in ’63 and ’64.  In addition to these top-flight achievements, Abarth victories in national, regional and club events were commonplace, providing the Corso Marche treasury with regular and substantial income stemming from the ‘57 agreement whereby Fiat made a payment to Abarth for each and every race win credited to one of its Fiat-based models.

 

But there was a downside to this apparently generous, sugar daddy arrangement – to maintain the competitiveness of Abarth’s numerous racing customers, across a wide spread of model types/variants, it was necessary to implement an ongoing programme of product development and resulting upgrades.  This was an expensive business – enough so to be prompting Carlo Abarth, Renzo Avidano and Carlo Scagliarini to consider a major strategical revision of Abarth & C’s operational style and commercial objectives.  Whilst this would need to include an upscaling of road car production there should be no implication that racing would become a just an incidental, low key aspect of Abarth’s activities.  Indeed, Carlo sought to optimise the commercial benefits accruing as a result of his company’s motor sport expertise.  But, whilst up to that point Abarth was associated mostly with the smaller engine capacity classes, for a higher profile and thus a more powerful halo effect to enhance the marketability of the road cars, there needed to be a new focus on ‘bigger’ racing models which could contend for victories in the most prestigious categories, such as the impending FIA Groups 4, 6 and 7 for prototypes/limited production sports cars.  This was the media coverage-attracting realm of the World Sportscar Championship and events at places like Le Mans, Nurburgring and Monza.  In addition, there was soon to be the Can-Am Challenge, providing a potentially lucrative channel to the U.S. automotive market.  Equally, there was much to be said for the commercial opportunities that could flow from participation with a Grand Prix car in the Formula One World Championship.

 

Any such undertaking would, however, require substantial immediate investment, particularly in terms of engineering innovation and effort.  Abarth would have to step beyond its comfort zone – the world of relatively simple, two and four cylinder in-line engines.  What had been achieved in working with such powerplants was not to be dismissed – after all, the 2 litre 4 cylinder Tipo 236 unit would be giving all of 270 bhp in ’71 as Abarth was absorbed into Fiat.  However, in aiming to run against a competitor such as Ferrari fielding cars with 3 litre engines, Corso Marche was going to have to be the birthplace of an 8 cylinder motor.  That established, it wasn’t difficult to conclude that this would be best configured as a 90° V8.  And, once you’d got comfortable with that as a notion, with somewhere like Le Mans in mind it was not so hard also to start contemplating the possibility of a 120° 12 cylinder of twice the capacity!

 

Understandably, there has been speculation as to why Abarth chose in ‘66 to launch its first V form engine with a capacity of no more than 2 litres.  According to Gianfranco Bossu - colleague of Luciano Fochi, Abarth’s engine designer - the original proposal was to create the engine as a means to compete with Ferrari in the European Hillclimb Championship.  This implies a lack of confidence in how much more power could be extracted from the 1946 cc 4 cylinder, 16 valve tipo 236B, then good for around 245 bhp.  But what about the competition? – as an example, the 2 litre Alfa Tipo 33 at that pointed boasted 260 bhp.  So Abarth should really be seeking to run with at least something in the 270/275 bhp range.  From the ’65-’67 perspective, 30 more bhp from the 4 cylinder was a very tall order.  To achieve such an increase, an 8 cylinder was essential, both to allow for future displacement growth and to ensure that individual components could be operated under less stress, thereby enhancing reliability/durability, characteristics so important in the longer distance World Sportscar Championship events.  For ’67, both Prototypes (limited to 3 litres) and Sportscars (limited to 5 litres) also featured an up-to 2 litre class.  The 2 litre capacity gave Abarth options in terms of event classes/categories.  Until competitiveness had been established, ‘class wins’ would be possible even if overall victory would not.

 

The all-alloy, four cam Tipo 239 engine was first presented publicly at the Turin Racing Car Show on 26^th February ’67.  With bore/stroke dimensions of 78 cm x 52 cm, the cubic capacity was 1987 cc.  The launch specification included twin spark ignition and four twin choke Webers.  With an 11:1 compression ratio, this initial set-up was said to be good for 230 bhp at 9,000 rpm.

Fig.01 Tipo 239 engine. Courtesy Berni Motore

With thanks again to Gianfranco Bossu, we know that the initial bench testing yielded very disappointing results in terms of both power and torque.  Gianfranco recalls that there was an immediate decision not to embark on an improvement programme and the project was in effect abandoned, the engine never chassis-mounted for track testing.  At the time, the Tipo 236’s maximum output was reported as being 220-230 bhp.  It is reasonable to infer that with the given greater weight of the Tipo 239 engine and its power being no more than 230 bhp, a V8-engined version of the SE04/L* would have been no quicker than one powered by the 4 cylinder.  Logically then, a decision to enlarge the Tipo 239 to 3 litres while tackling 2 litre class racing with the Tipo 236 seems well justified.

*The SE04 chassis which had been developed from the previous year’s 1000 SP model.  Thus it had a tubular chassis with mid-located engine, a car configured according to Mario Colucci’s thinking rather than Carlo Abarth’s.  However, a superficially similar car with box section chassis members and outboard engine had been built for comparison purposes.  First seen in May ’66 was a 982 cc engine-powered barchetta, of which 50 were built during the next 18 months, enabling it to be homologated for Group 6.  The two versions were tested at Vallelunga in January ’67, at this stage powered by the 4 cylinder Tipo 236 engine.  Evaluation concluded that future development should be with the mid-engine/tubular chassis configuration, designated SE004/FB2.  Rapidly forthcoming from the programme was a longer wheelbase version, identified as SE004/L.

 

Fochi pitched to Carlo Abarth the notion of increasing the cubic capacity, redesigning the heads with 32 valves and offering the engine on commercial terms to private customers.  Abarth apparently dismissed this idea out of hand, but authorised an evolution project for ’67 whereby the capacity would be taken up to 2968 cc.  This was achieved by increasing the bore to 88 mm and the stroke to 61 mm.  The prototype engine was put on the bench on 23 September ‘67, delivering 312.3 bhp at 8000 rpm.  It was first installed in a SE004/L chassis but soon mounted into a development of that car, designated SE013.  In what was otherwise known simply as a 3000 Sport Spider, the 3 litre Tipo 245 V8 made its race debut, a few days after its press presentation, on 6^th October ’68 at the Aspern Airport circuit in Austria.  Especially noteworthy was the high location of the coolant radiator – above the top of the roll-over bar – over the rear of the mid-mounted engine, a concept anticipating Gordon Murray’s experimental external cooling solutions with the Brabham BT46 the following decade.  The SE013 at this point had ‘nervous’ handling tendencies which were exacerbated by the heightened centre of gravity to which the radiator significantly contributed.  Despite this, works driver Peter Schetty put the car on pole and comfortably won the race from Arturo Merzario, who was running in Group 6 with a 2 litre Sport Spider.  At Innsbruck, Schetty recorded a second 3000 circuit victory on 20^th October.

Fig.02 Tipo 245 engine. Courtesy Berni Motore

Despite the ‘first time out’ victory, there was ready recognition that the car would not be competitive at higher profile events because of its handling characteristics.  With an ambition to run at the 24 Hours of Le Mans in ’69, it was essential that it be made easier/less taxing and tiring to drive.  But early-year progress was limited, leading to a decision that although an entry had been made, a Tipo 245-powered car would not be sent to Le Mans.  Instead, effort was invested in the evolution of the SE013 into the SE016, first shown on 2^nd September ‘69.  Obvious at first sight was relocation of the radiator to within the body and the addition of tabs on the front/lower ‘corner’ of the front wings, both measures deemed important in seeking better overall balance and to militate against the car’s propensity to generate front end lift.  Another change expected to deliver better handling was to 15” wheels, (from 13”).  However, at this point, and for an extended period, such components were impossible to obtain from the usual suppliers because of widespread workers’ union-led strikes.  Driven by Johannes Ortner, the car was nevertheless competitive, (3^rd when the race was prematurely stopped), at the 500 km of Imola, run later in the month.

Fig.03 SE013 left, SE016 right. Courtesy Berni Motore

In ’70, there were notable hillclimb victories for 3000 Sport Prototypes at Barisart (Belgium), Avignon (France) and Bergamo (Italy).  In late October, Abarth presented an upgraded version of the ‘3000 Sport Prototype,’ (SE020), at the Turin Motor Show.  Most notable revisions included a shorter wheelbase, more forward-located cockpit, extreme rear-mounted oil coolers and twin side placed coolant radiators.  The engine was upgraded – taking power up to 365 bhp – with the installation of fuel injection (Lucas) and capacitive discharge ignition (Dinoplex).  Despite these improvements, there was not a lot of confidence at Corso Marche.  Morale had been affected by a reduction in Abarth’s profitability and the disruptions attributable to Italy’s industrial relations strife experienced over the preceding three years.  Overlaying these fundamental concerns, was an internal recognition that the SE020 would struggle for competitiveness against the main Group 6, 3 litre class rival machines.  Though the Abarth V8’s power output was not greatly lacking in comparison with that of Porsche’s flat 8, (908/2), it was over 30 bhp down on the Alfa T33/3’s V8, and almost 100 bhp less than what the Ferrari flat 12 (312 PB) could muster.  A solution would be to resurrect Fochi’s 32 valve heads proposal, but with corporate financial robustness being as reduced as it was, that was a project which would again be deferred.

Fig.04 Carlo Abarth and Arturo Merzario stand behind the SE020, February '71

However, there was a niche which could be successfully exploited.  With a consistent record of good results in the category, there was a belief at Corso Marche that a bespoke version of the 3000 Sport could be a Group 5 contender for the European Hillclimb Championship.  Thus, the SE022 was unveiled in February ’71 at Campo Volo.  Designated a Monotipo, the SE022 was functionally similar to the SE020, but featured a substantial, enveloping-style windscreen frame/glass and carried a spare wheel for regulations-compliance.  ’71 saw nineteen 3000 Sport Prototype high profile hillclimb victories at Bellvue (Belgium), Draguignan (France), Liege (Belgium), Presberg (Germany), Villach (Austria), Gap (France), Jura (France), Abreschviller (France), Autun (France), Consenza (Italy), Berchtesgaden (Germany), Brescia (Italy), Avignon (France), Berwinne (Belgium), Clouneaux (France), Vuillifans (France), Trento (Italy), Sestriere (Italy) (2 classes).

Fig.05 SE022 driven by Johannes Ortner at Sestriere, July '71

Despite a visually appealing presentation of the three new Sport Prototypes and Carlo’s confident bearing at Campo Volo that February day in ’71, as an event this was a swansong.  On top of all the problems associated with the commerciality of the road car business and shortage of capital, a lack of confidence had been growing in Abarth’s motor sport customer community.  To ensure that such customers should not feel they were getting second best to the works team, Abarth created a division which could be seen as separate, self-sufficient and having 100% customer-focus.  He appointed Enzo Osella as its head, confident of the man’s expertise, abilities and alignment with his own principles.  At the same time he conducted a difficult negotiation for the sale of his company to Fiat, the confirmation of this being made in mid-October.  Fiat in effect endorsed the semi-external racing arm by delegating responsibility for the Abarth marque’s participation in the European Championship (for prototypes) to Osella for the ’72 season.  However, this did not involve utilisation of the V8 engine, and the cars became known as Abarth-Osellas.  But if that sounds like a downbeat development from a Corso Marche viewpoint, the upside was that with the Tipo 236 engine generating 270 bhp on Lucas fuel injection and a more reliable Hewland gearbox replacing the Abarth Tipo 139 unit, the Abarth-Osella SE021 was the championship-winning car of ’72.

If Only: The Abarth T140

The more I learn about Carlo Abarth, the more I wish I had had the opportunity to work for him.  He was I believe an especially notable example of the sort of distinctive personality one could encounter in a leader/senior management role in the automotive industry around the middle of the 20^th Century.  Their behaviour and outlook was such that in today’s social culture they probably would not retain their position for very long.  Such people had singular vision/belief, tremendous drive and no inhibitions about using their personality to manage and direct subordinates.  

  

In anecdotes from people who worked for him, Abarth himself is often referred to as someone who expected nothing less than their 100% dedication to the task, was very averse to ‘buttering them up,’ but who showed that he did in fact notice excellence by, for instance, handing over an envelope of bank notes!  By his own vision and dynamism he created a superb line of performance cars, the racing versions of which were highly successful, to the extent that they secured World Championships for six years in succession in the 1960s.  These achievements bolstered Abarth’s self-confidence whilst at the same time instilling in the Corso Marche factory workforce a pride in and dedication to his company.  These two factors are particularly relevant to the beginnings of a project designated ‘T140,’ which should have evolved into Abarth’s crowning glory.  Such a project – the creation of a 6 litre, V12-engine  and sports racing prototype car to compete with Ferrari, Porsche and Ford – needed to be originated and developed in a milieu of secrecy for which the automotive industry has never been well known.  And yet the obedient, proud and earnest workforce ensured with its discretion that both the engine and the body/chassis design were well advanced before anyone outside the Corso Marche factory gained any knowledge of the T140 before Spring 1967. 

The project had been announced internally by Carlo in July 1965.  The initial objective was competitiveness in the proposed new championship for Group 7 cars, the Can-Am Challenge Cup.  A joint initiative by the Sports Car Club of America and the Canadian Automobile Sports Club, the championship was due to be launched in September 1966 at Mont-Tremblant.  Abarth believed that the series, with its Johnsons Wax sponsorship, would offer a high profile marketing opportunity for his products.  However, with Group 7 being virtually a Formula Libre, he would need to create a new, much larger Abarth engine – designated ‘Tipo 240’ - to compete with the expected proliferation of ‘Big Block’ Chevrolet-engined cars contesting the races.

Responsibility for the engine’s design was delegated to Luciano Fochi.  Fochi – whose brother, Nino, was in charge of production at Abarth – had distinguished himself at Alfa Romeo, Maserati, Ferrari and Bugatti prior to joining Abarth in 1958.  In August the following year, Fochi persuaded Gianfranco Bossu, with whom he had worked at Bugatti, to move to Corso Marche, where they again collaborated with great expertise in the development of engines.  Recently, Gianfranco has kindly shared with me his recollections of the T140 project. 

By December 1966 a prototype engine with wet sump had been assembled.  The key features were: 120°, 5982 cc, V12,  SOHC, 24 valve, twin spark ignition, four Weber 40 LDA3C carburettors.  Bore was 92 mm and the stroke 75 mm.  The engine’s construction has previously been described as ‘modular’ in that the block and camshafts were composed of two joined component ‘halves.’  This was not of particular significance as these sub-components were newly created items and not derived from pre-existing, smaller capacity units.  However, the principle was noteworthy as applied also to the crankshaft, since it was at its centre joint – where power was taken off – that a major problem was discovered as soon as test running got underway.  The crankshaft is seen in Gianfranco’s contemporary sketch below:

 

Courtesy of Gianfranco Bossu

The arrangement is not exceptional, especially for a crankshaft of considerable length – that of the Porsche Type 912 Flat 12 917 engine, for instance, is similarly configured.  However, it was initially a weak point, giving rise to crack failures on the Tipo 240 engine.  Gianfranco remembers that the problem was solved by increasing the rigidity of the bearing supports with additional ribs and revised specification bearings.  At this stage the engine was found to be generating over 550 bhp.  With further development, including revision of the lubrication system resulting in the adoption of a dry sump in Quarter 1, 1967, 567 bhp was seen on the dynamometer; (Sample dyno graphs are seen below, with Power represented by the trace second from bottom, and Torque below that.)  With the project still in its early stages, it would have been reasonable to assume that higher output could be achieved with various upgrades, the application of fuel injection, for example.  Potential competitiveness can be judged by considering the performance of the Sixties large capacity racing power plants of Ford, Ferrari and Porsche.  The 7.0 V8 installed in the Mk.II version of the Ford GT40 developed 485 bhp; Ferrari’s mid-decade 330 P4s featured a 3 valve V12 which could give 450 bhp, while the later 512’s 5.0 V12 was good for 550 bhp; the Porsche 917 4.5 flat 12 had 520 - 580 bhp.  A disadvantage for the T240 was its weight, at 254.6 kgs (dry), whereas the 917, without the burden of a fluid cooling system, was 240.4 kgs.  It has been said that the prototype Tipo 240 engine was tested in a Lola T70 chassis, but no data exists to indicate just how well it performed on-track.

 

Courtesy of Gianfranco Bossu

But, of course, the potential of the T140 to take on that Big Three would depend also on the quality and capability of the chassis, which was designed by Antonio Tomaini.  Previously at Moretti, Tomaini had joined Abarth in 1962 to work in the design department.  However, before long Tomaini was also very active out and about at circuits, supporting the works team’s efforts, especially in terms of acquiring and evaluating feedback from the drivers.  For the T140, Tomaini set about designing a chassis in a format which would enable both an endurance racing coupe version and a Can-Am open car to be created with relative ease.  The timescale of the project did not allow the development of either the chassis or the bodywork to progress to any advanced stage, the latter being represented only by a wooden 1:1 model.  The origin of the style of the car can be seen in the contemporary OT Sport Spiders, which were Abarth’s first glass fibre-bodied products, and the 1600 OT Sport coupe.  The subsequent 2000 SE010 also provides a clear indication of how a finalised T140 would have looked.  The full size model was rendered by Sergio Seccatore who had arrived at Corso Marche in June 1966.  He recalls its initial presentation in his book, co-authored with Luca Gastaldi, Abarth Memories:

The wooden model was taken to the workshop, right beneath the technical office, and Colucci brought Abarth to see it.  Abarth looked at it but couldn’t understand the line of the car because the cuts for the doors, bonnet, lights hadn’t been made.  It was a beautiful piece of wood, a single shell.  So, Colucci called me to paint the model red.  I went to the storeroom but there wasn’t any red paint, so they gave me some iron rust preventer.  When the car was finished, Abarth came back and wanted to see the cuts for the doors, bonnet, lights, sockets and air vents, windshield.  I masked everything to paint the various parts with matt black paint.  I copied the headlights of the Ford GT40 and had the rear lights of the Alfa Romeo Giulia painted on the back.  I made holes for the headlights and started to mount one.  Abarth arrived at that moment.  He liked those solutions but when he picked up the light from the Giulia, he said it was too heavy and I had to find some others.  That one had a Zamak base and I had to find others in plastic.  So I went out on the street, to look at the cars parked there, hoping for inspiration.  I saw a Fiat 124 saloon: the rear lights were more or less the same shape and I had those purchased.  I completed the model.

Tomaini followed the conventions of the era in the construction of the chassis – mainly a tubular structure with aluminium and fibreglass panelling.  Some previous reviews of the T140 have cast doubt on how competitive it might have been, not only by way of engine performance, but also in terms of weight.  However, Abarth was quite adept at producing lithe prototype racing cars – the 2000 SE010 of 1968, for example, weighing in at just 480 kgs, to which the basic frame contributed a tiny 39 kgs.  For comparison, consider the contemporary Porsche 907, for which a kerb weight of 600 kgs has been quoted.  Tomaini and a design drawing of the T140 are shown below:

 

The mid-Sixties saw a considerable shake-up in the competitive hierarchy of endurance sports car racing.  Particular focus was increased on the Le Mans 24 Hours race and the determination of Henry Ford II to avenge, on-track, Ferrari’s rebuttal of a Dearborn take-over.  This gave rise to the GT40, a car which certainly delivered on Henry’s ambition, since it was driven to victory at Le Mans for 4 successive seasons, 1966-69.  The first two of those wins were achieved with the use of a 7 litre V8 engine.  For the governing body, the FIA, this caused concern – how could a good number of competitive entries be sustained if the performance benchmark was set by such a large capacity engine, especially, given the Paris-based FIA’s natural European-orientation – the continent’s automotive industry at that time being mainly engaged in projects with engines half that sort of size.  As a solution, and without preamble or consultation, on 12^th June 1967, the day after the second Ford victory by A J Foyt and Dan Gurney in a Mk.4 GT40, the FIA announced that for 1968 new ‘classes’ would apply for endurance racing, as defined by Appendix J to the International Sporting Code: Category A, production cars, Group 4 Sports cars; Category B, Group 6 Prototype sportscars.  For homologation, a manufacturer would have to produce at least 50 cars for Group 4 eligibility and engine capacity had to be less than 5 litres.  A 3 litre capacity limit applied for Group 6.  With a subsequent revision of the homologation requirement to 25 units, both Porsche and Ferrari would develop, respectively, the 917 and 512 models which provided some spectacular racing in 1970-71.

For Abarth, however, the announcement was wholly negative.  It was immediately concluded that the company did not have the financial strength and physical capacity to build and sell fifty T140s.  Equally, the continuance of the project to result merely in the construction of a very few examples to contest the Can-Am could not be justified on a cost/benefit analysis basis.  Sergio Seccatore’s recollection was that very soon after the FIA’s announcement, ‘We piled everything in a corner of the workshop and the story of the T140 ended like that.’  However disappointing that might be from my perspective, it’s quite possible that many at Corso Marche at the time breathed a sigh of relief.  It is said, for instance, that Carlo’s then manager of the mechanical chassis and bodywork department, Mario Colucci, was doubtful that the car could be built at a competitive weight.  Apparently, he also thought that the reported engine output values were somewhat exaggerated.  As with technical matters, such as the relative merits of a mid-chassis location for an engine against those applying to a rear-of-axle mounting, Colucci often acted as a foil to Carlo Abarth’s thinking, and he probably thought it prudent generally to counteract Carlo’s inherent optimism.  Though that optimism flowed from Carlo’s confidence built on a proven record of commercial and racing successes, it can equally be said that Colucci was well qualified to judge the specifics of chassis weight, he having designed the first tubular frame used by Abarth, for the 750 Sport, soon after he joined from Alfa Romeo in 1960.

Though the original project scope had included the manufacture of sufficient components to assemble two prototype engines, only a single unit has been seen in recent times.  This had been acquired by Engelbert Moll, former Abarth works driver (1963) and was a significant item in the collection of Abarth products held at his premises in Solothurn, Switzerland.  The Tipo 240 engine was the subject of much interest when displayed with other cars and engines from Moll’s collection at the Retromobile show in Paris, 2018, as seen in the photograph below.  I have been told by Tony Berni, global authority on Abarth and proprietor of Berni Motori, Maleo, Italy, that in the autumn of 2022, Moll sold his entire collection and it is now relocated in Japan.

 

As for the car, there is better news to report.  A BMW M73-engined replica was built by Hansi Marz in association with Udo Siekmann of Scuderia Gemini Corse and run at the Berni Motori track day held at Autodromo di Varano de’ Melegari in June 2017.  The car can be seen on the circuit here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dzKN0_ep5Gk.  It also featured in a Petrolicious article https://petrolicious.com/articles/the-abarth-historic-track-day-showcases-the-best-of-the-beloved-brand-from-bologna which included the photograph seen below:

 

It is quite commonplace to read critical comment about both the decision to embark upon the T140 project and the subsequent abrupt cancellation.  But it is not hard to see that the situation came about because both Abarth and the FIA planned and operated at the time with unusually well preserved secrecy.  What is less well known is that Abarth was not the only marque in that era which started a highly ambitious sport prototype project which came to nothing.  This was the aspiration of Dr Alfredo Belponer.  In the early Sixties he determined to create a new scuderia to support the activities of amateur racing drivers in and around his hometown of Brescia.  Establishment – and formal recognition – of Scuderia Brescia Corse became possible in late 1964 when Carlo Abarth agreed to support the team’s registration with the sporting authorities.  The Scuderia was soon successful, primarily in sports car events, and by 1967 was running a GT40 at Le Mans.  But Belponer had the ambition and wealth to go further, and he asked Bertone to create a Group 6 prototype.  The Carrozzeria obliged with a design named ‘Panther’ and it was unveiled in Turin and Geneva in Spring 1968.  More information about the Panther is available; here: https://supercarnostalgia.com/blog/bertone-panther

 

Scuderia Brescia Corse intended to order several Panthers and use them in an extensive international endurance racing campaign.  However, what Bertone could not do was produce suitable motive power for the car.  Belponer entered into discussions with BRM, seeking a supply of the Bourne-made F1 3.0 V12s, modified with durability rather than peak power, in mind.  When negotiations stumbled, he switched his quest to Maserati, but there too, no deal could be finalised.  As a result, just as with the T140, after much earnest effort, considerable expenditure and enthusiastic activity, the project just quietly expired.  The Panther is seen below:

 

I can’t help but wonder – how well would a Panther have gone with a short stroke, 5.0 Tipo 240 engine behind the driver’s seat!

Abarth T140 Update

It's taken longer to get here than I had expected, but I now have an update to the December 2021 post about the Abarth T140.  

The car offers a great deal of intrigue, all the more so since we can only 'glimpse' it as a concept - no functional example ever having been constructed, let alone run on-track.  Tantalising too, since the 12 cylinder engine had been completed/tested and a full size body model made.  And with many hours and lire spent on the project, it was cancelled unceremoniously, in response to the FIA's abrupt revision in June 1967 of the International Sporting Code, Appendix J definition of racing classes for the 1968 season.

Writing about the engine up to now has mostly included opinion that it was heavy and not especially powerful.  But development had only just got underway and I believe that given Abarth's proven expertise with the highly successful upgrading of Fiat and Simca engines for the little GTs, it could have made the Tipo 240 V12 a fully competitive proposition for endurance racing.

There also seemed to be some misunderstandings/conflicting summaries about the engine's architecture.  In order to better understand this I have recently been in touch with Gianfranco Bossu - colleague at Corso Marche of Luciano Fochi, designer of the T240.  Gianfranco not only most kindly shared with me his recollections of the engine's design and initial running, but also provided me with copies of his contemporary drawings, clarifying the basic layout and several points of detail.

I have completed a write-up on my findings covering both the car itself and the sporting/technical/commercial context.  The intention is to complement this with some new photography of the stunning T140 replica created by Hansi Maerz as a Scuderia Gemini project in collaboration with Udo Siekmann.  It's hoped that a photoshoot can be arranged shortly, and publication made before the end of the year.

Stay tuned!

Abarth 1300 OT - Last of the Sixties' Champions

The Simca 1000 platform adopted in 1961 for its GT race cars served Abarth well for the successive seasons, 1963-65.  Results achieved with the Abarth Simca 1300 Bialbero GT earned the World Championship for the Marque for those three years.  The Fochi-designed engine, (Tipo 230S), initially developing 128 bhp, had gained an additional 10 or 12 bhp by 1964.  For 1965, reliability was optimised by the introduction of a five main bearings version, and with kerb weight maintained around the 650 kgs mark, the car’s competitiveness was comfortably preserved.  However, the collaboration agreement with Simca lapsed at the end of 1964.  Carlo Abarth’s initial reaction in order to continue the Marque’s ability to race successfully in Group 4 was to give Mario Colucci his head and let him design a mid-engined, tubular chassis, aluminium-bodied coupe – the 1300 OTC. However, Abarth soon took against it, largely, no doubt, because of his aversion to the mid location for the engine, but also because the ‘ground-up’ nature of the design made it a more expensive car to develop than the modified production car basis which had been so successfully exploited up to then.  While still being developed, he decided to cut his losses and sold the car to the Lufthansa team, but it achieved little despite the change in ownership.

1300 OTC (Courtesy Webcarstory)

The experience with the OTC caused Abarth to revert to a Fiat chassis basis in developing a further new GT – the Tipo 137, 1300 OT - to spearhead its 1966 championship campaign.  The 850 platform combined well with a new glass fibre body, again styled by Mario Colucci.  The engine, Tipo 237, was carried over from the Abarth Simca GT, with 147 bhp, (and, eventually, 157 bhp), output in this application.  Weight of the car was just about the same as the Simca-based coupe.  The required number of 50 units was completed in Q1 of 1966, allowing homologation for Group 4 that April.

1300 OT unveiled at the 1965 Turin Motor Show (Courtesy Motorsport Images)

 

As launched, the car distinguished itself by having a body that was not only aesthetically pleasing, but also very effective aerodynamically.  Good enough in fact to enable it to achieve a higher top speed than the ‘sister’ 1600 OT spider model despite that benefitting from around 20 more bhp thanks to the larger capacity engine.  After initial consultation with glass fibre specialist, Michel Liprandi, (well known as co-founder of LMX Automobile S.R.L., maker of the Sirex GT), building of the bodies was the work of Sibona & Basano and incorporated features – notably, the front and rear ‘clamshells’ - that the carrozziere had innovated on the ‘long nose’ versions of the Abarth Simca GTs. Use of the clamshells also provided a link to the OTC which had featured this configuration.

1300 OT with opened clamshells. © 2012-2023 DAVINCI Media

A second series was developed for 1967, mainly distinguishable by its much larger Plexiglass rear ‘window,’  the roof-mounted ‘periscope’ engine air intake and the 10 bhp increase in engine power.

(Courtesy Conceptcarz.com)

© 2018 - 2022 Tumblr Gallery

It took 10 months for Abarth to build the 50 cars required for Group 4 homologation.  This hampered the car’s initial competitivity as it had to run in the prototype class until May 1966.  Despite this, however, 5 cars were fielded for the September running of the 500 kms of Nurburgring and that driven by Gerhard Mitter, finished 2^nd.  At the same circuit the following June, the 1300 OT competed in the 1000 kms for the first time as a Group 4 car in the International Sports Car Championship.  Seven cars in total were run, four being factory entries  It was a highly satisfactory debut since the car driven by Kurt Ahrens Jr and Ernst Furtmayr took the Division 1 victory.  In fact, the 1300 OT was victorious at the Green Hell twice in 1966, Furtmayr winning the 500 kms in the September.  The 1300 OT won its class at five of the season’s rounds, thus clearly heading the championship table, with Alpine in second place.  The other first-placed OTs were driven at Mugello by Luigi Taramazzo and Giulio Bona, at Enna by Alfio Gambero and at Zeltweg by Johannes Ortner.

1300 OT of Cella/Fischhaber, Nurburgring 1000 kms, June 1966 (Courtesy Motorsport Images)

The 1967 season’s first championship round was at Hockenheim in July, where Toine Hezemans led home a 1300 OT 1-2-3-4 result.  At Mugello it was ‘just’ a 1-2, with the winning 1300 OT driven by Hezemans, Furtmayr and Mauro Nesti.  As in 1966, Gambero took a 1300 OT to class victory at Enna, and Ortner also repeated his previous year win at Zeltweg.  Hezemans was again a winner at the Ollon-Villars hillclimb, while Furtmayr rounded off the year taking class honours at the Nurburgring 500 kms.  With 45 points, Abarth achieved a bigger margin of victory in the championship, second place going to Diva, which managed only 12 points.  Beyond the World Championship campaign, the 1300 OT won its class on the Targa Florio in the hands of Guido Garufi and Giuseppe Ferlito.  At Le Mans, Marcel Martin and Jean Mesange’s 1300 OT finished 16^th overall and 1^st in class.

Guido Garufi/Giuseppe Ferlito, class winners on the Targa Florio (Courtesy Antonio Garufi)

Marcel Martin/Jean Mesange class winners at Le Mans (Courtesy Motorsport Images)

The 1300 OT continued to be run in a range of events through the remaining 1960s and into the 1970s.  After 1967, however, models such as the 1000 SP, the 1600/2000 Sport Coupes and the SE04/10/14/18/19 assumed the lead role in Abarth’s sports car racing endeavours.  The SE020/22 followed, representing the end of the line for the Marque, while Osella took over responsibility for the Abarth brand’s on-track activities.